Former WWE employee Janel Grant recently made headlines when her lawyers filed a pre-action discovery petition against Dr. Carlon Colker and his clinic, Peak Wellness, Inc. This legal action stems from Grant’s claim that she was sent to the clinic under Vince McMahon’s direction in November 2019 and underwent undisclosed treatments, including pills and IV infusions.
In response to the allegations, Colker filed a complaint denying any improper treatment and stating that his reputation has suffered significant damages due to Grant’s accusations. He characterized Grant’s actions as part of a “smear campaign” aimed at supporting her previous claims of sex trafficking and sexual assault by WWE, Vince McMahon, and John Laurinaitis.
Grant, however, has not backed down and has taken steps to strike Colker’s bill of discovery while seeking penalties. Her legal team has described Colker’s response as a “desperate and brazen attempt” to silence her as she investigates potential wrongdoing related to her medical care.
The situation between Grant and Colker continues to unfold, with each party standing firm in their positions. The legal battle between the two sheds light on the complexities of seeking accountability and justice in cases involving medical treatment and allegations of misconduct.
Key Points to Consider:
Legal Action: Grant filed a pre-action discovery petition against Dr. Carlon Colker and his clinic, Peak Wellness, Inc.
Allegations: Grant claims she received undisclosed treatments at the clinic under Vince McMahon’s direction.
Response: Colker denied any improper treatment and accused Grant of a “smear campaign” to support her previous claims.
Current Status: Grant has filed a motion to strike Colker’s bill of discovery and is seeking penalties.
Ripple Effects: The case highlights the challenges of addressing medical care-related wrongdoing and misconduct allegations.
Overall, the conflict between Grant and Colker underscores the importance of transparency, accountability, and due diligence in healthcare practices. It serves as a reminder of the complexities involved when seeking justice and fair treatment in the face of challenging circumstances.
